The Resurgence of the Horrific, Harsh, and Ugly Reality of Childhood Diseases: The Inevitable Risk of Forgoing Vaccinations

In “When the Personal Really is Historical (and Scary!),” Jacqueline Antonovich, a gender and medicine historian, described her 21st-century experience with pertussis, a.k.a. whooping cough, an extremely contagious “good old-fashioned Oregon Trail disease” that recently reemerged since its near eradication in the 1970s. Antonovich inquired:

So who or what is to blame for the rising tidal wave of whooping cough misery? Are the non-vaccinating, yuppie/hippie parents to blame? After all, the anti-vaccine movement among parents has been gaining momentum for over a decade now, ever since British doctor, Andrew Wakefield used faulty science to allege a link between immunizations and autism.

robbb2While Antonovich suggests a recent surge in the anti-vaccine movement, records unveil a history fraught with ongoing controversy. Before vaccinations became a childhood rite of passage, every family knew someone who lost a child to a now vaccine-preventable disease. Yet despite the magnitude of casualties from smallpox, measles, polio, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis in populations lacking herd immunity, vulnerable communities did not always welcome vaccination campaigns with open arms.

The controversial roots surrounding vaccinations originate in debates regarding religious beliefs, safety and efficacy, corruption fears, personal liberties, and public health. Religious objectors believe that vaccinations defy the healing power and will of God. These objectors also claim that injecting foreign substances into the sacred body defiles it. Not too far afield, parents with an incomplete understanding of the immune system and the creation of antibodies necessary to combat disease question why they would knowingly inject their healthy children with potent, biologically active disease-causing agents.

While some uninformed parents question the efficacy of vaccines, others doubt the governmental and scientific safeguards aimed at protecting children. Following the 1982 NBC airing of DTP: Vaccine Roulette, mothers with disabled children alleged that pharmaceutical companies, in cahoots with government officials, collectively concealed the dangerous nature of vaccines. These mothers “compared vaccination laws to the practices of oppressive, communist regimes . . . [and called the] cover-up of vaccination risks ‘an American holocaust . . . a modern day Auschwitz.’”[1]

This invasion of personal liberty in the name of public health illustrates the contentious conviction that “epidemic disease, like war, is the health of the state.”[2] After state power officially penetrated the skin following the initiation of the first American compulsory vaccination laws in the 1850s, opponents hollered medical oppression and an invasion of parental authority and bodily sovereignty. The question had become: should the government intrude upon an individual’s right to choose vaccinations or should officials ultimately ensure the well-being, health, and safety of the entire nation?

Clearly, the anti-vaccination movement flourished long before Wakefield’s unsubstantiated claim challenged the integrity of the scientific community and triggered a renewed worldwide scare over vaccine safety. Perhaps the most important factor to consider when noting the reduction in vaccination rates in the twenty-first century is the relative disappearance of once epidemic diseases. After scientists gained an understanding of immunology, bacteriology, and virology, vaccines allowed nations to proactively protect themselves. Today, many parents, pediatricians, and vaccine opponents lack first-hand experience with the crippling diseases vaccinations almost completely eradicated in America. Thus, vaccines became victims of their own success. An ‘out of sight, out of mind’ mentality appeared as childhood diseases disappeared. This attitude allowed the growing concern over vaccine side effects to flourish.

robb3In “An Epidemic of Fear: How Panicked Parents Skipping Shots Endangers Us All,” Amy Wallace introduces readers to Paul Offit, a Philadelphia pediatrician and coinventor of a rotavirus vaccine. Since the rotavirus kills approximately 600,000 children per year, this vaccine saves hundreds of innocent lives each day. Recognizing the rhetoric of risk and freewill that propels the anti-vaccine movement, Offit empathically defends the risks involved in protecting children. Wallace noted:

He [Offit] wants Americans to be fully educated about risk and not hoodwinked into thinking that dropping vaccines keeps their children safe. “The choice not to get a vaccine is not a choice to take no risk . . . It’s just a choice to take a different risk, and we need to be better about saying, ‘Here’s what that different risk looks like.’”

Yet getting parents and vaccine opponents to understand the horrific, harsh, and ugly reality of these childhood diseases remains incredibly difficult. Before vaccinations emerged as one of the top public health advancements of the twentieth century, smallpox killed 500 million people, polio paralyzed 16,000 Americans each year, and measles killed 3000 people annually.[3] Infant mortality was high and life spans were cut short. Today’s third world problems ran rampant in first world nations. How many outbreaks and innocent lives must now be claimed in vulnerable communities lacking herd immunity before vaccination rates rise again?


  • Natisha Robb, an Iowa native and biological chemistry major at Grinnell College, wishes to pursue a career in medicine or youth development following graduation in May 2014. Natisha serves as a student development representative and genetics research assistant at Grinnell and tutors incarcerated students through the Liberal Arts in Prison Program. Natisha also volunteers as a fundraiser and advocate for Grinnell Public Health and Medical Global Brigades while leading a small group and coordinating outreach efforts for Grinnellians Seeking Christ.

Notes and References

[1] Conis, Elena, “A Mother’s Responsibility: Women, Medicine, and the Rise of Contemporary Vaccine Skepticism in the United States,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 87, no. 3 (2013): 430.

[2] Willrich, Michael, “The Least Vaccinated of Any Civilized Country: Personal Liberty and Public Health in the Progressive Era,” Journal of Policy History 20, no. 1 (2008): 76.

[3] Ibid.

VACCINATIONS – Your KIDS – what do YOU do ????,” Truthology.

Latest H1N1 Swine Flu News,”

Heidi Stevenson, “The Coming Push to Give HPV Vaccines to Infants,” January 20, 2014 Health Impact News Daily, from

About the Author

No Comments

Jacqueline Antonovich

What a wonderful piece, Natisha! A pleasure to read!
I would also add that religious and medical quarrels over “vaccines” have been with us even before the American Revolution. In the early eighteenth century, Cotton Mather advocated an inoculation procedure against smallpox and there were huge disagreements over religion (if inoculation violated the Sixth Commandment – Thou shall not kill) and who had medical authority – ministers or doctors. I believe someone got mad enough at Mather that at one point someone threw a lighted grenade at his house.


I’m afraid the problem with anti-vaccination sentiment goes far beyond what at least on the surface sound like “reasonable” questions about the safety of vaccines. Even setting aside Wakefield’s discredited statements, a surprising number of people out there believe conspiracy theories about vaccines that rational people regard as batsh*t nuts–stuff like “vaccines contain RFID chips” and “the Illuminati is deliberately causing diseases to kill off 90% of the world’s population.” Conspiracy theories such as these seem to float under the surface of what we might call “reasonable” concern about vaccines, but they are literally believed by millions of people. It’s another example of the extreme harmfulness of conspiracy thinking, which itself is a highly contagious disease in dire need of a cure.

Sean Cosgrove

Hi Natisha,
I find vaccination politics incredibly interesting and you cover a lot of ground really well in this piece. You’ve probably already read it, but in case you hadn’t, Michael Willrich’s (award-winning) book Pox ( is great.
It’s an easy read and offers some further comment on the issues you raise (for instance, the risk assessment parents needed to make when faced with the vaccination of their children, and the legacies of this).
Well done!


I expect the real story is, as always, much more complicated and messy. Those who are opposed to some or all childhood vaccines, or who make the decision to postpone certain vaccines for their children, are often very well informed. It’s important to question the assumptions we bring to our research. We all have our strongly-felt positions on issues but to do our work well, we need to be able to stay open to, and account for, that which does not fit neatly and comfortably into our own worldview.


Excellent post, and congratulations for being featured on Nursing Clio! The argument embedded within the vaccination debate–i.e., whether personal liberty/decision-making should trump collective decisions–reveals, I think, how difficult it is for governments to ensure the well-being of their citizens when each citizen is defined as an autonomous unit. Sometimes the health of the collective has to come before the preferences of the individual–even though that idea is almost an anathema in a highly individualistic society like the United States.


I had a really bad reaction to a vaccination as child (I don’t know specifically). That coupled with some of the anti-vaccination rhetoric going on at the time was enough to scare my mom enough to keep me from being vaccinated. I ended up getting all the most important ones in my late teens so I could attend college, and I feel very fortunate not to have gotten (or spread) a serious disease as a child. Good article.

Comments are closed.